Corrective and Preventive Action Explained with Examples (CAPA)

Corrective action and preventive action are two of the most important concepts in any Quality Management System (QMS). They play a critical role in eliminating problems, preventing failures, improving processes, and meeting the requirements of standards like ISO 9001 and IATF 16949.

Despite their importance, many professionals still get confused about the difference between corrective action and preventive action, how to implement them correctly, and how auditors evaluate CAPA effectiveness. This article explains corrective and preventive action in simple language with practical manufacturing examples.

What is Corrective Action and Preventive Action

Corrective action and preventive action are systematic approaches used to improve processes by addressing problems and risks.

Corrective Action
Corrective action is taken to eliminate the root cause of an existing nonconformity or problem to prevent its recurrence. It is reactive in nature and is implemented after a defect, failure, or nonconformity has already occurred.

Preventive Action
Preventive action is taken to eliminate the cause of a potential nonconformity or risk before it occurs. It is proactive in nature and focuses on preventing problems rather than reacting to them.

In simple words, corrective action fixes problems that have already happened, while preventive action stops problems from happening in the future.

Corrective Action and Preventive Action

Corrective action and preventive action are quality improvement activities used to eliminate problems and prevent failures. Corrective action removes the root cause of an actual nonconformity to prevent recurrence, while preventive action eliminates the cause of a potential nonconformity to prevent occurrence. Both are essential for continuous improvement in ISO 9001 and IATF 16949 systems.

Difference Between Corrective Action and Preventive Action

Understanding the difference between corrective action and preventive action is essential for audits, root cause analysis, and effective quality management.

This table is especially useful for ISO audits and interview questions.

AspectCorrective Action (CA)Preventive Action (PA)
1. DefinitionAction taken to eliminate the cause of an existing nonconformity or problem.Action taken to eliminate the cause of a potential nonconformity or problem.
2. FocusFocuses on problems that have already occurred.Focuses on problems that may occur in the future.
3. TimingReactive in nature (after the issue happens).Proactive in nature (before the issue happens).
4. ObjectiveTo prevent the recurrence of the same problem.To prevent the occurrence of a possible problem.
5. Trigger PointTriggered when a defect, error, or failure is detected.Triggered by risk assessment, audits, or trend analysis.
6. Example in ManufacturingFixing a machine process after detecting defective parts.Introducing error-proofing (poka-yoke) to avoid defects before they occur.
7. ScopeLimited to specific nonconformities that have already happened.Broader scope, covering potential risks across processes.
8. Evidence RequirementRequires evidence of a nonconformity.Does not require evidence of a nonconformity—only risk indicators.
9. ApproachShort-term: containment → root cause analysis → permanent fix.Long-term: risk analysis → preventive controls → monitoring.
10. OutcomeReduces the chances of recurrence of the same issue.Eliminates or reduces the chances of future issues before they arise.

Why Corrective and Preventive Action is Important

Effective CAPA implementation helps organizations to

  • Reduce rejection and rework
  • Prevent repeat customer complaints
  • Improve process stability
  • Comply with ISO 9001 and IATF 16949 requirements
  • Demonstrate continuous improvement during audits

Weak corrective and preventive action systems often lead to repeated nonconformities and major audit findings.

Corrective and Preventive Action Examples (Manufacturing)

Corrective Action Example

Problem
Repeated customer complaints for dimension out-of-tolerance parts.

Root Cause Identified
Tool wear is not monitored properly.

Corrective Action Taken
Tool life monitoring system implemented.
Preventive maintenance frequency revised.
Operator training conducted.

Result
Rejection reduced and no recurrence of the same issue.

This is a clear example of corrective action because the problem had already occurred.

Preventive Action Example

Potential Problem Identified
PFMEA analysis shows risk of material mix-up during shift change.

Preventive Action Taken
Color coding of material bins implemented.
Material identification checklist added.
Operator awareness training conducted.

Result
No material mix-up incidents occurred.

This is a preventive action because it prevents a problem before occurrence.

Corrective and Preventive Action Example Table

ScenarioCorrective ActionPreventive Action
Customer complaintRoot cause analysis and action to stop recurrenceRisk review to prevent similar complaints
Internal audit NCFix the process and update the procedureTraining and risk-based controls
Rejection trendProcess correction and validationSPC and trend monitoring
Machine failureRepair and root cause eliminationPreventive maintenance planning

CAPA Process Steps (Best Practice)

Corrective Action Steps

  1. Identify the nonconformity or problem
  2. Analyze the root cause using tools like 5 Whys or Fishbone
  3. Define corrective action
  4. Implement the action
  5. Verify effectiveness
  6. Update documents if required

Preventive Action Steps

  1. Identify potential risks or failure modes
  2. Evaluate risk severity and occurrence
  3. Define preventive action
  4. Implement preventive controls
  5. Monitor effectiveness
  6. Update PFMEA and Control Plan

Corrective and Preventive Action as per ISO 9001

As per ISO 9001:2015 Clause 10.2, organizations must take corrective action when nonconformities occur and prevent recurrence. Preventive action as a separate clause was removed, but its intent is covered through risk-based thinking across the standard.

Preventive actions are now addressed through

  • Risk identification
  • Process planning
  • Design and development controls
  • Operational planning

CAPA in IATF 16949

In IATF 16949, corrective and preventive actions are more structured and data-driven. CAPA is closely linked with

Effectiveness verification is mandatory, and weak CAPA implementation often results in repeated nonconformities.

Common Mistakes in Corrective and Preventive Action

  • Treating correction as corrective action
  • Not performing proper root cause analysis
  • Closing CAPA without an effectiveness check
  • Using preventive action only on paper
  • Repeating the same issues due to weak controls

Avoiding these mistakes improves audit performance and real process improvement.

Best Practices for Effective CAPA

  • Use data and trends, not assumptions
  • Always focus on the root cause, not the symptoms
  • Link CAPA with PFMEA and Control Plan
  • Define clear responsibilities and timelines
  • Verify effectiveness with evidence


Conclusion

Corrective action and preventive action are not just audit requirements but powerful tools for continuous improvement. When implemented correctly, CAPA reduces defects, improves customer satisfaction, and strengthens the overall quality management system.

Organizations that focus on prevention rather than correction always achieve better quality performance and audit results.

1 thought on “Corrective and Preventive Action Explained with Examples (CAPA)”

Leave a Comment